4 thoughts on “Forbes Post, “The Social Security Trust Fund Is Real – But So What?”

  1. This is a very confusing subject thanks to FDR’s selling the program to Americans by creating the term ‘trust fund’ to comfort fears. As you indicate, there is no separate pot of money here but just promises from the government, which are just as valid as a Treasury note’s promise to pay. Both based on the creditworthiness of the U.S.A.
    What I object to is the use of the terms ‘insolvent’ or ‘bankrupt ‘ when the paper accounting for accumulated payroll tax inflow becomes less than the paper accounting for SSN outflows. Since the left hand of the government can always borrow to fund the right hand, there can be no such thing as insolvency.

    Like

  2. A government bond is merely a promise by the government to collect money from future tax payers. The Social Security trust fund is government bonds. Without the power of the government to collect taxes it would be the same as nothing.

    Like

  3. Have searched for a while but have never found the Social Security Administration’s definition of a “Trust”. Hoping for commentary on this site when convenient…

    Like

  4. The entire discussion is intellectually dishonest except for the admission that one choice is to increase the tax All that has to be done is to increase the tax. All you have to do is look at the solvency of the Railroad Retirement Fund and see how it is maintained. Why doesn’t it increase: because business petitions congress not to raise the rates. INCREASE THE TAX.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s