4 thoughts on “Forbes post, “WEP Follow-Up: The Social Security Government Pension Offset Is Also Entirely Reasonable”

  1. Thoughtful article. Two comments: 1). Being employed by a private companies permits you to buy insurance for your family; that does not mean the company covers the cost. My husband made the choice to retire early. That meant he lost his employer provided health insurance. We put him on mine. It costs over $900 a month to place him on my insurance . The cost for families with children even more. When many workers are making just over minimum wage, who can afford this? 2) you mention that higher wage earners subsidize lower wage earners when it comes to social security benefits. As a higher wage earner, I am actually happy to do that. The societal benefits alone are worth it and I think we forget that to our own peril. Personally, I was happy to put in a bit more do that people like my great aunt who worked as a rural telephone operator had something to live on . I was also thrilled that she was able to get subsidized housing in a senior housing center during her last decade. I knew she was safe and not isolated. It wasn’t fancy but it was decent and well maintained. Most of all, it was affordable— she paid a percentage of her monthly Social Security check. All of us working and pulling together can do more than each of us on our own.


  2. I disagree with your statements that WEP and Government Pension Offset (GPO) is entirely reasonable . You are obviously not a victim of these two discriminatory programs, or affected by their application. Imagine starting work as a nurse, private security guard, or any other non-public service employment, and work a minimum of 10 years (earning 40 quarters) or more, having had FICA, MEDICARE, withheld from your salary all that time AND expecting to receive a SSA retirement like everyone else for your FICA contributions that you have to make. Then at some point in your late work career you decide to accept work in the public sector as you approach retirement, and as you prepare to retire, you find that the social security stipend you were expecting from your FICA contributions will be substantially reduced due to something called the WEP (windfall elimination provision)—-in my opinion a misnomer, as NO ONE EVER GOT RICH WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT—–getting back to the point, this occurs to most people in this situation (entering public service late in their careers) to make up for the shortfalls they will experience due to the WEP, and it doesn’t end there if they have a Spouse who dies and are affected by the GPO provision. In my opinion these two provisions of federal pension law are age discriminatory, because they primarily affect older workers about to retire or retired, without any recourse of getting any portion or all of their FICA REFUNDED, to address legitimate needs such as handling Medicare A/B health insurance cost increases—–I call such a concept by the Government as stealing from the ELDERLY, A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, DISCRINMNATORY, and PREDATORY…. The attitude reflected in your article is very prejudicial, and judgemental, that it’s reasonable to take “earned value” from one person who earned it o give to another, BECAUSE YOU SAY SO,….A VERY DICTATORIAL SOCIALIST POLICY, neither just or fair……


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s