5 thoughts on “Forbes post, “Required Minimum Distributions: Is There An Unintended Nudge?”

  1. Regarding the RMD “nudge.” Whether they automate the RMD process so that it’s invisible or leave it up to us to withdraw RMDs ourselves, for many of us that additional IRA income (+ SS + pension + ??) adds up to way more then we need to meet our annual expenses and way more tax liability. At a time when many retirees are still practicing tax avoidance, this new proposal would be beneficial in keeping our tax bracket as low as possible.


  2. I am in total agreement. Administrators of retirement plans should, by default, automate the RMDS for their customers, especially 401k and other plans where the pro-rata rule governs. The law is unequivocal, is it not? Only the Treasury benefits when an RMD is missed.
    In the case of IRAs, however, there should be an opt out mechanism in case the owner of multiple accounts wants to make the RMD from only one account.


  3. Wouldn’t it make most sense to move the unneeded RMD distribution by converting it into a Roth IRA? Then it would grow tax free.


  4. Sometimes serms the brokerage owning account fo6rs not want to disgorge the money in account. Had this with fidelity. And moved money out


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s